Legal Constraints And Its Effect On The War On Terror

The war on terror, following the events of 9/11, made people acknowledge a new form of enemy. Terrorisms became the central focus of nations and various actions were taken to ensure that such a horrendous act never transpires again. However, the problems associated with these legal constraints has led to many international law violations. This paper will seek to discuss these legal constraints and its effect on the war on terror. In order to demonstrate this, the principles of distinction, proportionality and military necessity will be examined to understand whether the legal actions of the United States were appropriate and legal. The principles of distinction, proportionality and military necessity are central to jus in bello (also known as â€Å"the laws of war†). These three principles are closely interconnected with one another and are necessary to determine whether a war can be perceived as being legitimate. In this paper, the principles of distinction, proportionality and military necessity will be defined and discussed in relation to the event of 9/11. As well as, the legal constraints that are associated with the conduct of hostilities under the new conditions imposed. The term â€Å"terrorism† and â€Å"terrorist† were included following the events of 9/11, identifying a new type of enemy. Narratives of who the enemy was changed towards individuals who were or seemed like a Muslim. Muslims were perceived as the new enemy. This subsequently led to major legal constraints such asShow MoreRelatedRelevance Of Sovereignty And The Threat Of Terrorism Essay1482 Words   |  6 PagesRelevance of Sovereignty Sovereignty, in its’ most traditional Westphalian view, is defined by scholars as the principal and expectation that states have legal and political supremacy –or ultimate authority–within their territorial boundaries (F.L.S. 47), but as the world continues to grow and complex, the relevance of Westphalian sovereignty is repeatedly questioned. Many factors now play into the role of sovereignty, complicating the once simplistic view. These factors include the expanding necessityRead MoreThe Writ of Habeas Corpus and War on Terror in the United States2183 Words   |  9 Pagesï » ¿Habeas Corpus Context War Terror 1. The general meaning of the right of habeas corpus in the U.S. Constitution and its relationship to the protection of other civil liberties. Blackstone said that the writ of habeas corpus is the most celebrated and venerated of the English law. The US constitution therefore carried this important aspect and thus federal courts were authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus in all cases where a person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation ofRead MoreIllegal Immigration: Pros and Cons1128 Words   |  5 Pagesmovement of people from a source country to the destination country without any legal documents and violates destination countries immigration laws. People have moved across lands over years to escape a war situation or to get better facilities in a different country. Countries have defined immigration laws to restrict people to enter their land without proper documentation as illegal immigration social and time constraint issues is areas such as social welfare, health care, voting rights, economy andRead MoreThe Issue Of International Law1695 Words   |  7 Pagesfrom crime (including terrorism), whi lst respecting individual state sovereignty and maintaining maximum participation of states. How effective is International Law in achieving this aim? What are the pitfalls and how might these be removed or the effects ameliorated? The term terrorism originated during the French revolution (1789-1799), referring to attempts by the new regime to consolidate its power and intimidate opponents who still supported the old monarchy. Ironically, many definitionsRead MoreWhat Is The Transformation Of The Finance Function?1024 Words   |  5 Pagesinformation that is rapidly evolving along with the economic growth. As you well know our finance and accounting departments are under fire to perform dynamically. More exceptional than before is the weight to drive real-time intelligence and the constraints to develop a forward-looking analysis to support a business decision. In retrospect, this coincides with dramatic shifts in business simulations, and regulatory environments, the risk assessment with doing nothing are ever-growing, and companiesRead More American Civil Liberties are NOT Violated by the Patriot Act1878 Words   |  8 Pages The U.S. Patriot Act was a bill adopted under the Bush administration that purportedly affords the government the tools required to surveil, investigate, and share information pertaining to national security without major judicial constraints. This allows the government, for instance, to monitor Internet usage and provides effective communication between different agencies of federal authorities (Olsen, 2001). Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, while discussing the PatriotRead MoreUnited Nations Peacekeeping Operations Before and After the Cold War2644 Words   |  11 PagesHow did the historical facts change Peacekeeping operations before and after the cold war? History In order to understand the concept behind peacekeeping we have to first look at the history of this UN term and how it got established. The initial kick-off year was 1948 (un.org) when the Security Council deployed troops to the Middle East in order to observe the region. It was the outcome of the creation of the state Israel andRead MoreShould National Security Ever Override Free Speech?1797 Words   |  8 Pagesthe opposite. Changes to laws pertaining to security of Australia, which have been extended to cover the Border Force Act (Immigration, 2015), impose repressive limitations on the reporting of events at Manus Island Detention Centre, including constraints applied to medical professionals and independent visiting Non-Government Organisations (NGOs). Using any reasonable assessment, the suppression of free speech in regard to the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers is not justifiable, particularlyRead MoreHabeaus Corpas6626 Words   |  27 PagesThe War against Terror as War against the Constitution Jackson A. Niday, II Abstract: This essay examines rhetorical dynamics in the 2004 US Supreme Court case Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. News reports suggested the court split 8-1 or 6-3. However, case texts show substantive disagreements created a 4-2-2-1 split in the court. Moreover, while the justices on the bench split into four camps rather than two, those camps were not defined along ideological lines. This essay argues that pragmatism, the legalRead MoreWomen s Rights : Women And Public Policy2739 Words   |  11 Pagesbetween men and women.(Tickner, 2008:263-268) Traditionally, the academic discipline of IR was ruled by men and gender was ignored by dominant men. There was no room for women since IR was described by masculine words such as power, security, military, war and conflict. Therefore, the assertion that ‘IR has been profoundly gendered’ is convincing in the contemporary world politics. How to exercise state power are the women come from? Politics of peace and community members can live happily in abundance

War Is Military Force Ever Justified. War Has Become

War: Is Military Force Ever Justified? War has become a very sensitive, polarizing subject in the past few decades. Either it’s good or bad, right or wrong, black or white. Many people do not find any justification, even though no decision is more thought out than a country’s decision to use military force. for anything war-related because of the negative reality that it is war: violent, nasty, unyielding. All they see is an unprejudiced killing parade that rips lives apart. But what many people fail to realize that there is some gray areas surrounding military force.There is not a definite yes or no when it comes to war, and not all wars are choices. When it comes to national security and keeping America safe, war is undeniably†¦show more content†¦The press does everything it can to show pro-war propaganda, in way which shows the urgency of issues and justifying the use of force by our brave military. The press normalizes war as a patriotic event, and almost seems to ostracize those who do not back it, labeling them as unpatriotic. The news outlets exaggerate issues and show war as the last and only option. So, when is war okay? For one, when a country’s borders are threatened. If a country is being invaded, there is a reason to use military force. When a country’s citizens are in danger, the country should be able to use military force. There is an obligation for the military to protect American citizens, and that sometimes entails using force. Fighting for our freedom, safety, and happiness is a reason to use military force. Examples of such would include when we entered WWII after the attack on Pearl Harbor, or when we went to war in the Middle East after 9/11 as a way to prevent further attacks on US soil. Another reason would be if a larger, more powerful country attacks one of our allies, or even a smaller, defenseless country. Morally, America should step in and do the right thing and help these other countries keep their people safe. Cases like this are harder to justify, as they are not totally necessary; however, they are are smart. Building allies and keeping relationships strong means more protection when it comesShow MoreRelatedThe World During The Cold War Essay1379 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Cold War and the present in terms of security challenges and issues faced by states when investigating the fine details of documents and actions but when retrospective on overall effect and our current global situation there are significant similarities can be found. The security and protection of the state has fundamental always been a priority of importance for any government or organisation since the unforeseen end to the Cold War between Soviet Russia and the United States. There has been astonishingRead MoreThe War Theory Of War1469 Words   |  6 PagesWhat is War? The term war can be defined as a clash that arises between different groups, states or nations. Different ethnic backgrounds, religious beliefs, and scarce resources are just a few of many reasons why such an act of violence may be practiced throughout the world. However, could a war ever be completely just? And if so, who would be responsible for deeming what would and would not be considered as being morally and theologically justified? This will be discussed in further detail laterRead MoreA Brief Note On The Act Of Terrorism1688 Words   |  7 Pagesneither moral, nor immoral - no act in itself ever is. Morality of an act is determined by the intentions of its perpetrators and by the circumstances under which it takes place. Killing is a morally neutral act, it is the intention of the killer and the circumstances under which the act takes place, that make it a crime of murder subject to a heavy punishment, an unfortunate accident , or an act of valour rewarded by a medal. In the course of wars or matters of internal policy involvingRead MoreWhen Should The United States Use Its Military?1494 Words   |  6 PagesWhen should the United States use its military? One of the biggest controversies facing America today is war. The US has been involved in many wars and violent conflicts throughout our history. To politicians, it may seem like using our military is an easy solution for problems here and in other countries. However, it does not come without consequences, including the obvious one;loss of lives. Even if the United States wins the conflict they have inserted themselves in, it cannot be forgottenRead MoreThe Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan: A Necessary Evil or an Unnecessary Act?1198 Words   |  5 Pagesand Nagasaki, Japan would experience something that no other people had ever experienced before, and no other people have experienced since. Within three days in the month of August 1945 and nearing the end of World War II, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would become the testing ground and their people the test dummies for a new kind of war weapon; the atomic bomb. Was this act necessary to bring an end to World War II as h as been claimed? No, it was not. For months, many of Japan’s cities hadRead MoreThe Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki888 Words   |  4 Pagesa thousand to save millions? Well the drastic actions taken by the United States did save millions. There were two actions that had to occur to save the millions and end the war, the dropping of the two atomic bombs being the first of their kind were to be the most powerful bomb ever invented using atomic and nuclear forces so create it and packed over 20,000 tons of TNT and was about ten feet long. The bomber that transported and dropped them was called the Enola Gay’. The two Japanese cities’Read MoreAmerican Sniper Essay1331 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"Al-Shaitan† â€Å"The American Sniper† by Chris Kyle is an account of the deadliest American sniper ever, called â€Å"the devil† by the enemies he hunted and â€Å"the legend† by his Navy SEAL brothers. From 1999 to 2009, U.S. Navy SEAL Chris Kyle recorded the most career sniper kills in United States military history. The Pentagon has officially confirmed more than 150 of Kyles kills (the previous American record was 109). Iraqi insurgents feared Kyle so much they named him al-Shaitan (â€Å"the devil†) and placedRead MoreThe American Sniper By Chris Kyle1307 Words   |  6 PagesEnglish 11 â€Å"Al-Shaitan† â€Å"The American Sniper† by Chris Kyle is an account of the deadliest American sniper ever. He was called â€Å"the devil† by the enemies he hunted and â€Å"the legend† by his Navy SEAL brothers. From 1999 to 2009, U.S. Navy SEAL Chris Kyle recorded the most career sniper kills in United States military history. The Pentagon has officially confirmed more than 150 of Kyle s kills (the previous American record was 109). Iraqi insurgents feared Kyle so much theyRead MoreThe United States Involvement During The Vietnam War1729 Words   |  7 PagesVietnam was the longest war the U.S. has ever took part in and was considered an extended military engagement due to the fact congress never formally declared war with Vietnam (FCNL). The Vietnam War began on November 1, 1955 and lasted for 20 years until April 30, 1975. The war was fought between the communist Northern Vietnamese and the anti-communist Southern Vietnamese after the country was temporarily divided by th e Geneva Accords. Americas entering of the Vietnam War proved to be an extremelyRead MoreThe Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1593 Words   |  7 Pages Bombing of Hiroshima On August 8th 1945 the first atomic weapon, a fission bomb, was dropped on the city of Hiroshima in an attempt to force the Japanese to surrender in World War II (Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 2009). This event exposed the danger of nuclear energy. This massive explosion demolished 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people. This was only the beginning though, tens of thousands of innocent people died due to the aftermath of radiation exposure for another

I Have a Dream Speech free essay sample

Kings speech not only changed history for the black community, but it also gave hope to blacks throughout the world. His speech was so successful because he was able to arouse his audience to their feet and get them to take action in society. The reason for the great impact of the speech, â€Å"I Have a Dream,† is due to the tense social mood of the time and that it reflects the conditions of the time, giving black activists a vision for the future. It struck directly into the hearts of blacks across America, and made whites ashamed of their actions and be willing to have a new start. In just 17 minutes, King influenced and informed the people about racial equality and fairness. Later, near the end of his speech, King continues to â€Å"preach† this point. For example, he stated, â€Å"†¦little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers. We will write a custom essay sample on I Have a Dream Speech or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page King talks about the future and how one day, freedom will â€Å"ring† from all across the United States and how people of all races will be able to â€Å"join hands† and be â€Å"brothers and sisters. † He strongly desires a united world where racism will not exist. He says, â€Å"With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. † Overall, King intelligently used a well-planned structure to manipulate his audience into agreeing with him.